Effects of PDE-3 inhibition in persistent post-traumatic headache: evidence of cAMP-dependent signaling.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE-3) inhibition have been implicated in the neurobiologic underpinnings of migraine. Considering the clinical similarities between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH), we aimed to ascertain whether PDE-3 inhibition can elicit migraine-like headache in persons with PPTH. METHODS: We tested cilostazol, which inhibits PDE-3, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study involving persons with PPTH attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. The randomized participants were allocated to receive oral administration of either 200-mg cilostazol or placebo (calcium tablet) on two separate experiment days. The primary end point was the incidence of migraine-like headache during a 12-hour observation window post-ingestion. The secondary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) for reported headache intensity scores during the same observation window. RESULTS: Twenty-one persons underwent randomization and completed both experiment days. The mean participants' age was 41.4 years, and most (n = 17) were females. During the 12-hour observation window, 14 (67%) of 21 participants developed migraine-like headache post-cilostazol, in contrast to three (14%) participants after placebo (P =.003). The headache intensity scores were higher post-cilostazol than after placebo (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide novel evidence showing that PDE-3 inhibition can elicit migraine-like headache in persons with PPTH. Given that PDE-3 inhibition increases intracellular cAMP levels, our findings allude to the potential therapeutic value of targeting cAMP-dependent signaling pathways in the management of PPTH. Further investigations are imperative to substantiate these insights and delineate the importance of cAMP-dependent signaling pathways in the neurobiologic mechanisms underlying PPTH. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05595993.

The Use and Impact of Cilostazol on Patients Undergoing Endovascular Peripheral Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is used for the treatment of intermittent claudication. The impact of cilostazol on the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) remains controversial. This study assesses the use and impact of cilostazol on patients undergoing PVI for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database files for PVI were reviewed. Patients with PAD who underwent PVI for chronic limb threatening-ischemia or claudication were included and divided based on the use of cilostazol preoperatively. After propensity matching for patient demographics and comorbidities, the short-term and long-term outcomes of the 2 groups (preoperative cilostazol use versus no preoperative cilostazol use) were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 245,309 patients underwent PVI procedures and 6.6% (N = 16,366) were on cilostazol prior to intervention. Patients that received cilostazol were more likely to be male (62% vs 60%; P < 0.001), White (77% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), and smokers (83% vs. 77%; P < 0.001). They were less likely to have diabetes mellitus (50% vs. 56%; P < 0.001) and congestive heart failure (14% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Patient on cilostazol were more likely to be treated for claudication (63% vs. 40%, P < 0.001), undergo prior lower extremity revascularization (55% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and less likely to have undergone prior minor and major amputation (10% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive cilostazol. After 3:1 propensity matching, there were 50,265 patients included in the analysis with no differences in baseline characteristics. Patients on cilostazol were less likely to develop renal complications and more likely to be discharged home. Patients on cilostazol had significantly lower rates of long-term mortality (11.5% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001 and major amputation (4.0% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in rates of reintervention, major adverse limb events, or patency after PVI. Amputation-free survival rates were significantly higher for patients on cilostazol, after 4 years of follow up (89% vs. 87%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol is underutilized in the VQI database and seems to be associated with improved amputation-free survival. Cilostazol therapy should be considered in all patients with PAD who can tolerate it prior to PVI.

Cilostazol May Improve Outcomes Even in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Aged 75 Years and Older: Multicenter Cohort Study and Propensity Score-Matched Analyses.

BACKGROUND: The opportunities to treat elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are increasing globally, but the outcome remains poor. This study seeks to investigate treatment-related factors that can modify functional outcomes in patients with aSAH aged ≥75 years. METHODS: A total of 202 patients with aSAH aged ≥75 years prospectively enrolled in 9 primary stroke centers from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical variables including treatments for hydrocephalus, angiographic vasospasm, and delayed cerebral ischemia were compared between patients with good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2) and poor (mRS score 3-6) outcomes at 90 days from onset, followed by multivariate analyses to find independent outcome determinants. A modifiable treatment-related variable was evaluated after propensity score matching with adjustments for age, sex, pre-onset mRS score, aSAH severity, and treatment modality. RESULTS: More than half of patients showed World Federation of Neurological Societies grades IV-V on admission. Univariate analyses showed that advanced age, worse pre-onset mRS score, more severe neurologic status on admission, higher modified Fisher grade on admission computed tomography scans, and acute and chronic hydrocephalus were associated with poor outcomes. In contrast, administration of a phosphodiesterase type III inhibitor, cilostazol, was associated with good outcomes in both univariate (P = 0.036) and multivariate analyses (adjusted odds ratio, 0.305; 95% confidence interval, 0.097-0.955; P = 0.042). Propensity score matching analyses showed that patients treated with cilostazol had better outcomes (P = 0.016) with fewer incidences of delayed cerebral infarction (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Even in patients with aSAH aged ≥75 years, cilostazol administration may lead to better outcomes by suppressing the development of delayed cerebral infarction.

Cilostazol pretreatment prevents PTSD-related anxiety behavior through reduction of hippocampal neuroinflammation.

Current pharmacological treatments against post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) lack adequate efficacy. As a result, intense research has focused on identifying other molecular pathways mediating the pathogenesis of this condition. One such pathway is neuroinflammation, which has demonstrated a role in PTSD pathogenesis by causing synaptic dysfunction, neuronal death, and functional impairment in the hippocampus. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors (PDEIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents against neuroinflammation in other neurological conditions. Furthermore, PDEIs have shown some promise in animal models of PTSD. However, the current model of PTSD pathogenesis, which is based on dysregulated fear learning, implies that PDE inhibition in neurons should enhance the acquisition of fear memory from the traumatic event. As a result, we hypothesized that PDEIs may improve PTSD symptoms through inhibiting neuroinflammation rather than long-term potentiation-related mechanisms. To this end, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of PDE3, on PTSD-related anxiety symptoms in the underwater trauma model of PTSD. PDE3 is expressed much more richly in microglia and astrocytes compared to neurons in the murine brain. Furthermore, we used hippocampal indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO) expression and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) concentration as indicators of neuroinflammation. We observed that cilostazol pretreatment prevented the development of anxiety symptoms and the increase in hippocampal IDO and IL-1ß following PTSD induction. As a result, PDE3 inhibition ameliorated the neuroinflammatory processes involved in the development of PTSD symptoms. Therefore, cilostazol and other PDEIs may be promising candidates for further investigation as pharmacological therapies against PTSD.

Cilostazol versus Aspirin or Clopidogrel for Reducing Post-Stroke Aspiration Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The association between the use of cilostazol as a post-stroke antiplatelet medication and a reduction in post-stroke pneumonia has been suggested. However, whether cilostazol has a greater preventive effect against post-stroke aspiration pneumonia (AP) than other antiplatelet medications remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate whether cilostazol has a greater preventive effect against post-stroke AP than aspirin or clopidogrel. METHODS: Through the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke between April 2012 and September 2019. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between patients who received cilostazol alone at discharge and those who received aspirin or clopidogrel alone at discharge. The primary outcome was the 90-day readmission for post-stroke AP. The occurrence of recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days was also evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 305,543 eligible patients with ischemic stroke, 65,141 (21%), 104,157 (34%), and 136,245 (45%) received cilostazol, aspirin, and clopidogrel, respectively. Propensity score matching generated 65,125 pairs. The cilostazol group had a higher proportion of 90-day post-stroke readmissions with AP than the aspirin or clopidogrel groups (1.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days was also higher in the cilostazol group (2.4% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that cilostazol may not have a greater effect on preventing post-stroke AP within 90 days than other antiplatelet medications. Nevertheless, further randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are warranted.

Cilostazol addition to aspirin may worsen the short-term outcome in patients with large artery disease: ADS subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Our previous acute dual study (ADS) reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of neurological deterioration in non-cardioembolic stroke patients. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated whether the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may depend on neurological severity, as represented by large artery disease. METHODS: Neurological deterioration was defined as neurological progression with an increment of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥2. NIHSS score subgroups were divided into that of 0-1, 2-4, 5-10, and >10. RESULTS: Among 1014 patients, 203 (20%) had the large artery disease, and 811 (80%) did not. In the total cohort, the rate of neurological deterioration was 10.8% in the DAPT group and 8.3% in the aspirin group (P = 0.197). When we focused on the large artery disease group, DAPT group had a higher rate of neurological deterioration as 18.3% compared to 8.2% in the aspirin group (P = 0.036). Among patients with NIHSS score of 0-1 and 2-4, the rates of neurological deterioration were not different between the two group (both, P = 1.000). However, when NIHSS score elevated to 5-10, 45% in the DAPT group and 9.1% in the aspirin group deteriorated (P = 0.013). Among the patients with NIHSS score of >10, 60% in the DAPT group and none (0%) in the aspirin group had the neurological deterioration (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: DAPT with aspirin and cilostazol was associated with higher rate of neurological deterioration when patients have large artery disease and not mild neurological deficits.

Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Recent evidence indicates the efficacy of ß-amyloid immunotherapy for the treatment of Alzheimer disease, highlighting the need to promote ß-amyloid removal from the brain. Cilostazol, a selective type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitor, promotes such clearance by facilitating intramural periarterial drainage. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of cilostazol in mild cognitive impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants: The COMCID trial (A Trial of Cilostazol for Prevention of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia) was an investigator-initiated, double-blind, phase 2 randomized clinical trial. Adult participants were registered between May 25, 2015, and March 31, 2018, and received placebo or cilostazol for up to 96 weeks. Participants were treated in the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center and 14 other regional core hospitals in Japan. Patients with mild cognitive impairment with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of 22 to 28 points (on a scale of 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment) and Clinical Dementia Rating scores of 0.5 points (on a scale of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3, with higher scores indicating more severe dementia) were enrolled. The data were analyzed from May 1, 2020, to December 1, 2020. Interventions: The participants were treated with placebo, 1 tablet twice daily, or cilostazol, 50 mg twice daily, for up to 96 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the change in the total MMSE score from baseline to the final observation. Safety analyses included all adverse events. Results: The full analysis set included 159 patients (66 [41.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 75.6 [5.2] years) who received placebo or cilostazol at least once. There was no statistically significant difference between the placebo and cilostazol groups for the primary outcome. The least-squares mean (SE) changes in the MMSE scores among patients receiving placebo were -0.1 (0.3) at the 24-week visit, -0.8 (0.3) at 48 weeks, -1.2 (0.4) at 72 weeks, and -1.3 (0.4) at 96 weeks. Among those receiving cilostazol, the least-squares mean (SE) changes in MMSE scores were -0.6 (0.3) at 24 weeks, -1.0 (0.3) at 48 weeks, -1.1 (0.4) at 72 weeks, and -1.8 (0.4) at 96 weeks. Two patients (2.5%) in the placebo group and 3 patients (3.8%) in the cilostazol group withdrew owing to adverse effects. There was 1 case of subdural hematoma in the cilostazol group, which may have been related to the cilostazol treatment; the patient was successfully treated surgically. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, cilostazol was well tolerated, although it did not prevent cognitive decline. The efficacy of cilostazol should be tested in future trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02491268.

Cilostazol for the management of moyamoya disease: a systematic review of the early evidence, efficacy, safety, and future directions.

Surgical revascularization remains the standard treatment for symptomatic moyamoya disease (MMD). As with any major surgical treatment, revascularization is associated with risks and limitations, denoting the need for noninvasive treatments to improve ischemic symptoms and prevent strokes. Cilostazol is a selective phosphodiesterase III inhibitor with antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and vasodilatory effects commonly used in peripheral vascular disease. Clinical studies assessing the efficacy of cilostazol in the management of stroke and MMD were recently reported, although a comprehensive assessment of the overall evidence is lacking. A systematic scoping review was conducted to assess the early evidence on cilostazol administration in patients with MMD. The inclusion criteria encompassed original human studies primarily focused on cilostazol's safety, efficacy, or utilization in managing MMD patients. A search of the PubMed database was conducted in June 2023, yielding 5 peer-reviewed publications that satisfied the inclusion criteria and were subjected to narrative synthesis. Risk of bias assessment was not applicable due to the scoping nature of this review. East Asian studies demonstrate increasing rates of cilostazol prescriptions for patients with MMD. In a large population-based study, cilostazol was compared to other antiplatelet medications and yielded the largest decrease in mortality among patients with newly diagnosed MMD. Other studies reported significant improvements in cerebral blood flow and cognitive function, which were deemed to be independent of one another. There are limited data on the safety profile of cilostazol in the MMD population, although the evidence derived from various studies performed in the general stroke population can likely provide insights into its potential utility in MMD patients. Cilostazol targets several critical pathways involved in the pathophysiology of MMD. The evidence corroborates the potential benefits of cilostazol for the management of MMD, although these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies and lack of randomized trials. Subgroups of patients need to be identified who can safely undergo medical management in lieu of revascularization surgery or to improve surgical outcomes. Additional studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol therapy, especially in Western populations.

Effect of Cilostazol on Patients With Diabetes Who Underwent Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Artery Disease.

Background No large-scale study has compared the clinical impact of triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT: aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on adverse limb events in patients with diabetes after endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease. Thus, we investigate the effect of cilostazol added to a DAPT on the clinical outcomes after EVT in patients with diabetes using a nationwide, multicenter, real-world registry. Methods and Results A total of 990 patients with diabetes who underwent EVT were enrolled from the retrospective cohorts of a Korean multicenter EVT registry and were divided according to the antiplatelet regimen (TAPT [n=350; 35.4%] versus DAPT [n=640; 64.6%]). After propensity score matching based on clinical characteristics, a total of 350 pairs were compared for clinical outcomes. The primary end points were major adverse limb events, a composite of major amputation, minor amputation, and reintervention. For the matched study groups, the lesion length was 125.4±102.0 mm, and severe calcification was observed in 47.4%. The technical success rate (96.9% versus 94.0%; P=0.102) and the complication rate (6.9% versus 6.6%; P>0.999) were similar between the TAPT and DAPT groups. At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of major adverse limb events (16.6% versus 19.4%; P=0.260) did not differ between the 2 groups. However, the TAPT group showed less minor amputation than the DAPT group (2.0% versus 6.3%; P=0.004). In multivariate analysis, TAPT was an independent predictor of minor amputation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.354 [95% CI, 0.158-0.794]; P=0.012). Conclusions In patients with diabetes undergoing EVT for peripheral artery disease, TAPT did not decrease the incidence of major adverse limb events but may be associated with a decreased risk of minor amputation.

Effect of cilostazol on preventing paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is a significant clinical problem can markedly deteriorate patient's quality of life (QoL). Preclinical evidence exists about the preventive capacity of cilostazol against peripheral neuropathy. However, this hypothesis has not yet been clinically investigated. This proof-of-concept study evaluated the effect of cilostazol on the incidence of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN: This is a parallel randomized placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: The Oncology Center at Mansoura University, Egypt. PATIENTS: Patients with breast cancer scheduled to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 biweekly. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to either cilostazol group who received cilostazol tablets 100 mg BID, or to control group who received placebo instead. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the incidence of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy evaluated through common terminology criteria for adverse event (NCI-CTCAE) version 4. Secondary endpoints included assessment of the patient's QoL by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTx) subscale. Exploratory outcome measures included changes in serum levels of biomarkers namely nerve growth factor (NGF), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of grade 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathies were significantly lower in the cilostazol group (40%) compared to the control group (86.7%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of clinically significant worsening in neuropathy-related QoL was higher in control group compared to the cilostazol group (p = 0.001). A higher percent increase from baseline in serum NGF was observed in the cilostazol group (p = 0.043). The circulating levels of NfL deemed comparable between the two arms at the end of the study (p = 0.593). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive use of cilostazol is as a novel option that might reduce the incidence of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy and improve the patients' QoL. Future larger clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Isosorbide Mononitrate and Cilostazol Treatment in Patients With Symptomatic Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: The Lacunar Intervention Trial-2 (LACI-2) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a common cause of stroke (lacunar stroke), is the most common cause of vascular cognitive impairment, and impairs mobility and mood but has no specific treatment. Objective: To test the feasibility, drug tolerability, safety, and effects of 1-year isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) and cilostazol treatment on vascular, functional, and cognitive outcomes in patients with lacunar stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Lacunar Intervention Trial-2 (LACI-2) was an investigator-initiated, open-label, blinded end-point, randomized clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. The trial aimed to recruit 400 participants from 26 UK hospital stroke centers between February 5, 2018, and May 31, 2021, with 12-month follow-up. Included participants had clinical lacunar ischemic stroke, were independent, were aged older than 30 years, had compatible brain imaging findings, had capacity to consent, and had no contraindications to (or indications for) the study drugs. Data analysis was performed on August 12, 2022. Interventions: All patients received guideline stroke prevention treatment and were randomized to ISMN (40-60 mg/d), cilostazol (200 mg/d), ISMN-cilostazol (40-60 and 200 mg/d, respectively), or no study drug. Main Outcomes: The primary outcome was recruitment feasibility, including retention at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were safety (death), efficacy (composite of vascular events, dependence, cognition, and death), drug adherence, tolerability, recurrent stroke, dependence, cognitive impairment, quality of life (QOL), and hemorrhage. Results: Of the 400 participants planned for this trial, 363 (90.8%) were recruited. Their median age was 64 (IQR, 56.0-72.0) years; 251 (69.1%) were men. The median time between stroke and randomization was 79 (IQR, 27.0-244.0) days. A total of 358 patients (98.6%) were retained in the study at 12 months, with 257 of 272 (94.5%) taking 50% or more of the allocated drug. Compared with those participants not receiving that particular drug, neither ISMN (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.09]; P = .16) nor cilostazol (aHR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.05]; P = .10) alone reduced the composite outcome in 297 patients. Isosorbide mononitrate reduced recurrent stroke in 353 patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.23 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.74]; P = .01) and cognitive impairment in 308 patients (aOR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86]; P = .008). Cilostazol reduced dependence in 320 patients (aHR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.72]; P = .006). Combination ISMN-cilostazol reduced the composite (aHR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.92]; P = .02), dependence (aOR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.59]; P = .008), and any cognitive impairment (aOR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.85]; P = .02) and improved QOL (adjusted mean difference, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.17]; P = .005) in 153 patients. There were no safety concerns. Conclusions and Relevance: These results show that the LACI-2 trial was feasible and ISMN and cilostazol were well tolerated and safe. These agents may reduce recurrent stroke, dependence, and cognitive impairment after lacunar stroke, and they could prevent other adverse outcomes in cSVD. Therefore, both agents should be tested in large phase 3 trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03451591.

Cilostazol novel neuroprotective mechanism against rotenone-induced Parkinson's disease in rats: Correlation between Nrf2 and HMGB1/TLR4/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

Neuroinflammation induced by activation of the high mobility group box 1/ toll-like receptor 4 (HMGB1/TLR4) axis is one of the principal mechanisms involved in dopaminergic neuronal loss in Parkinson's disease (PD), and its activation exacerbates oxidative stress augmenting neurodegeneration. AIMS: This study investigated the novel neuroprotective effect of cilostazol on rotenone-intoxicated rats focusing on the HMGB1/TLR4 axis, erythroid-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Protein kinase B (Akt)/the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. The aim is extended to correlate the Nrf2 expression with all assessed parameters as promising therapeutic targets for neuroprotection. MAIN METHODS: Our experiment was designed as follows: vehicle group, cilostazol group, rotenone group (1.5 mg/kg, s.c), and the rotenone pretreated with cilostazol (50 mg/kg, p.o.) group. Eleven rotenone injections were injected day after day, while cilostazol was administered daily for 21 days. KEY FINDINGS: Cilostazol significantly improved the neurobehavioral analysis, the histopathological examination, and dopamine levels. Moreover, the immunoreactivity of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) enhanced. These effects were associated with enhancement of the antioxidant expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 by 1.01 and 1.08-fold, respectively, and repression of HMGB1/TLR4 pathway by 50.2 % and 39.3 %, respectively. Upregulation of the neuro-survival PI3K and Akt expression by 2.26 and 2.69-fold, respectively, and readjusting mTOR overexpression. SIGNIFICANCE: Cilostazol exerts a novel neuroprotective strategy against rotenone-induced neurodegeneration via activation of Nrf2/HO-1, suppression of HMGB1/TLR4 axis, upregulation of PI3K/Akt besides mTOR inhibition that compels more investigations with different PD models to clarify its precise role.

Peripheral Nerve Denervation in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats Is Reduced by Cilostazol.

Background and Objective: Our previous study demonstrated that consistent treatment of oral cilostazol was effective in reducing levels of painful peripheral neuropathy in streptozotocin-induced type I diabetic rats. As diabetic neuropathy is characterized by hyperglycemia-induced nerve damage in the periphery, this study aims to examine the neuropathology as well as the effects of cilostazol treatments on the integrity of peripheral small nerve fibers in type I diabetic rats. Materials and Methods: A total of ninety adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into the following groups: (1) naïve (control) group; (2) diabetic rats (DM) group for 8 weeks; DM rats receiving either (3) 10 mg/kg oral cilostazol (Cilo10), (4) 30 mg/kg oral cilostazol (Cilo30), or (5) 100 mg/kg oral cilostazol (Cilo100) for 6 weeks. Pain tolerance thresholds of hind paws toward thermal and mechanical stimuli were assessed. Expressions of PGP9.5, P2X3, CGRP, and TRPV-1 targeting afferent nerve fibers in hind paw skin and glial cells in the spinal dorsal horn were examined via immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Results: Oral cilostazol ameliorated the symptoms of mechanical allodynia but not thermal analgesia in DM rats. Significant reductions in PGP9.5-, P2X3-, CGRP, and TRPV-1-labeled penetrating nerve fibers in the epidermal layer indicated denervation of sensory nerves in the hind paw epidermis of DM rats. Denervation significantly improved in groups that received Cilo30 and Cilo100 in a dose-dependent manner. Cilostazol administration also suppressed microglial hyperactivation and increased astrocyte expressions in spinal dorsal horns. Conclusions: Oral cilostazol ameliorated hyperglycemia-induced peripheral small nerve fiber damage in the periphery of diabetic rats and effectively mitigated diabetic neuropathic pain via a central sensitization mechanism. Our findings present cilostazol not only as an effective option for managing symptoms of neuropathy but also for deterring the development of diabetic neuropathy in the early phase of type I diabetes.

Do Patients With Arterial Occlusive Disease of Different Etiologies Benefit Equally From Cilostazol?

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is a guideline-recommended drug that improves intermittent claudication and quality of life in patients with chronic atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease. The drug is used for most etiologies of arterial occlusive diseases in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate whether patients benefit equally from cilostazol regardless of etiology. METHODS: Patients on cilostazol were divided into 4 groups according to arterial occlusive disease etiology: (1) atherosclerosis, (2) diabetic angiopathy, (3) embolism/thrombosis, and (4) Buerger disease. Patients' maximum walking distance, ankle-brachial index score and distal tissue oxygen saturation (Sto2), clinical improvement onset time, ability to reach maximum benefit time, vascular surgeries, and wounds were compared before they started cilostazol and after 12 months. Results were evaluated at a statistical significance of P < .05. RESULTS: In 194 patients, 307 target extremities were evaluated in the 4 disease groups. After cilostazol use, maximum walking distance, ankle-brachial index score, and distal Sto2 increased significantly in all groups (P < .001), but distal Sto2 in the diabetic angiopathy and Buerger disease groups was significantly lower than in the atherosclerosis group (P < .001). Ankle-brachial index and distal Sto2 differences in the Buerger disease group were significantly lower (both P < .001). The vascular surgery counts decreased significantly in the atherosclerosis and embolism/thrombosis groups (P = .019 and P = .004, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with nonatherosclerotic arterial occlusive disease also benefit from cilostazol, but patients with Buerger disease or diabetic angiopathy seem to benefit less. Combining cilostazol with anticoagulant or antiaggregant agents and closer monitoring of these patients may produce better results.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Cilostazol for Secondary Prevention in Lacunar Stroke: Subanalysis of the CSPS.com Trial.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to prevent recurrent strokes in patients with lacunar stroke remains unclarified. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and to elucidate the safety and effectiveness of DAPT and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in preventing recurrence in chronic lacunar stroke. METHODS: CSPS.com (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. In this prespecified subanalysis, 925 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 69.4% men) with lacunar stroke were selected from 1884 patients with high-risk noncardioembolic stroke, enrolled in the CSPS.com trial after 8 to 180 days following stroke. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SAPT or DAPT using cilostazol and were followed for 0.5 to 3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcomes were severe or life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: The DAPT group receiving cilostazol and either aspirin or clopidogrel and SAPT group receiving aspirin or clopidogrel alone comprised 464 (50.2%) and 461 (49.8%) patients, respectively. Ischemic stroke occurred in 12 of 464 patients (1.84 per 100 patient-years) in the DAPT group and 31 of 461 patients (4.42 per 100 patient-years) in the SAPT group, during follow-up. After adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors, ischemic stroke risk was significantly lower in the DAPT group than in the SAPT group (hazard ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.22-0.84]). The rate of severe or life-threatening hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the groups (2 patients [0.31 per 100 patient-years] versus 6 patients [0.86 per 100 patient-years] in the DAPT and SAPT groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.07-1.81]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lacunar stroke, DAPT using cilostazol had significant benefits in reducing recurrent ischemic stroke incidence compared with SAPT without increasing the risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique identifier: UMIN000012180.

Cognitive effects of cilostazol in Alzheimer's dementia patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: A case-control study.

AIM: Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is a slowly progressing neurodegenerative disease, characterized by beta-amyloid deposition and neurofibrillary tangles. Peripheral atherosclerosis may deteriorate these processes via endothelial cell dysfunction and microvascular impairment. Cilostazol - a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor - is a standard treatment for peripheral arterial occlusive disease and a potential treatment for preserving cognitive function in AD patients. We aimed to determine whether cilostazol is beneficial in AD patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by evaluating Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) domains. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 62 AD patients in Taiwan. Thirty-one patients had peripheral arterial occlusive disease and were receiving cilostazol plus acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AchEIs) or N-methyl d-aspartate antagonists, whereas 31 others were receiving AchEIs. Therapeutic responses were measured using neuropsychological assessments. The CASI was administered at baseline and 12 months later; different domains were analyzed between the groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Age, sex, education duration, ApoE ε4 gene status, and initial Mini-Mental State Examination scores were not different between the two groups. Except for fluency, no CASI domains showed a statistical difference between the groups. A significant difference was observed in category fluency (P = 0.010). In the logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for covariate effects, category fluency still showed a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: In AD patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who have received Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapy, cilostazol, as an antiplatelet, may help to preserve general cognitive function, with significant preservation in category fluency. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 194-199.

Association between perioperative management of antiplatelet agents and risk of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in early gastric cancer: analysis of a nationwide multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data are lacking regarding post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) bleeding in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who take antiplatelet agents (APAs), particularly in those taking thienopyridine and cilostazol. We aimed to clarify the association between the status of APA medication and post-ESD bleeding risk. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis using data from a recently conducted nationwide multicenter study in Japan. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with APAs or on no antithrombotic therapy recruited from 33 institutions who underwent ESD for EGC between November 2013 and October 2016. The primary outcome of this study was the relationship between the rate of post-ESD bleeding and the status of each APA medication. RESULTS: A total of 9736 patients were included in the analysis. Among 665 aspirin users, the continuation group was significantly associated with post-ESD bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-4.37). Among 227 thienopyridine users, the aspirin or cilostazol replacement group was not significantly associated with post-ESD bleeding (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, .72-4.78). Among 158 cilostazol users, there was no significant association with post-ESD bleeding, irrespective of medication status. The rate of post-ESD bleeding was approximately 10% to 20% irrespective of the status of APA administration among dual-antiplatelet therapy users. No patients experienced thromboembolic events in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of thienopyridine with aspirin or cilostazol may be acceptable for minimizing both the risk of post-ESD bleeding and thromboembolism in patients with EGC. In patients on cilostazol monotherapy undergoing ESD, continuation of therapy may be acceptable.

Combined carvacrol and cilostazol ameliorate ethanol-induced liver fibrosis in rats: Possible role of SIRT1/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway.

Carvacrol is a natural phenolic monoterpenoid, and cilostazol is a selective phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects. This experiment aimed to explore the hepatoprotective effects of carvacrol and cilostazol alone and in combination against alcoholic liver fibrosis (ALF), and the underlying mechanisms, using silymarin as a reference anti-fibrotic product. ALF was induced by oral administration of ethanol (1 ml/100 g/day) thrice per week. Silymarin (100 mg/kg), carvacrol (70 mg/kg), cilostazol (50 mg/kg), or carvacrol + cilostazol combination were administered daily and concurrently with ethanol for six weeks. Hepatic changes were evaluated by quantifying serum biomarkers of liver injury, hepatic MDA, GSH and NOx as oxidative stress markers, interleukin (IL)-10 as an anti-inflammatory cytokine, 4-hydroxyproline (4-HYP) as a collagen synthesis indicator, transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 as a profibrogenic cytokine, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) as a marker of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) activation, histopathological (necroinflammation and fibrosis) scores and hepatic sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), and hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1) mRNA levels. Our results showed that carvacrol, cilostazol, and their combination significantly ameliorated ethanol-induced hepatic fibrosis manifested as improving hepatic functions and histopathological features, attenuating α-SMA immunostaining, reducing TGF-ß1 and 4-HYP levels, suppressing oxidativeinjury and elevating IL-10 contents. Such effects were accompanied by upregulating SIRT1, Nrf2 and HO-1 genes. This work disclosed for the first time the hepatoprotective effect of carvacrol against ALF and, to a greater extent, with carvacrol + cilostazol combination that could be partially accredited to SIRT1/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway with consequent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic features.

Cilostazol as a Treatment for COVID Toes: A Case Report.

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, skin lesions resembling those seen in pernio (chilblains) have been observed in patients with COVID-19 infection. The term "COVID toes" has been used when there is toe involvement. We describe the case of a fully vaccinated, 56-year-old woman with no prior diagnosis of COVID-19 who developed pernio-like lesions many months after being vaccinated. Her skin lesions resolved after treatment with cilostazol, suggesting that this medication may be a viable treatment for pernio in the setting of COVID-19 infection.